Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Election

London has fantastic radio stations. Or, more specifically, the BBC has fantastic radio stations. I recommend loading up the old BBC website (www.bbc.co.uk) and having a browse. The most thrilling part is that all the programs can be streamed up to a week after the original broadcast.
It completely puts the CBC to shame. For shame, CBC.
However, the BBC is propped up by a fat T.V. licensing tax that anyone owning a T.V. must pay. You can't just opt out by only using T.V to watch DVDs, or anything else sneaky. Trade-off is no commercials and really good programs.
So perhaps it should be, For shame, Canadian government, for shame.
In unrelated government slagging, why are they (by they I mean the Broadcast Consortium and those in power) still not letting the Green Party on the televised Leaders' debate?
At least provide a benchmark for guaranteed inclusion.

The televised leaders' debates for the 2006 election have excluded Green Party of Canada leader Jim Harris, despite his leading a national party running candidates in all 308 ridings and having earned the votes of over 580,000 Canadians in the 2004 federal election. Leaving these decisions to the unaccountable Broadcast Consortium that controls the debates is a threat to Canadian democracy


http://www.greenparty.ca/leaders_debates.html

I'm still very impressed with the Green Party's platform and while I understand the need to keep the Conservatives out, hence voting Liberal (boring), I think they're worth a look.
For shame, Broadcast Consortium

I'll try not to sprain my ankle getting off my soapbox



6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know. I don't know why they don't leave the Green Party out when they allow the Bloc to be in. The Bloc have nothing to do with most of the country, and the Green are in every riding. I predict it's only a matter of time until the Green's are allowed to participate in the debate.
However, the Green are pretty conservative so while they're an interesting alternative I'm still voting NDP.

You should have voted from London. I wonder if that would have been difficult (can you still do it)?

3:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I should have proof-read that before I posted it...

3:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Stupid TV licencing ... £10 per month! ... grumble, grumble ...

When it the election? Is it over with already?

3:46 AM  
Blogger Julia said...

NDP! I approve. but it sounds like the conservatives have it in the bag. Not that unhappy about being over here now.
(the election's on Monday, Patricia)

1:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Green Party would likely be invited to more publically broadcasted events if the leader could actually answer questions when on camera, rather than simply gripe about not getting in on the national leaders' debate. I've never seen a senior national news anchor appear more frustrated than when trying to get Jim Harris to actually answer a question about his platform.

9:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wonderful and informative web site. I used information from that site its great. acyclovir dose Examples of agreements to repay loans Per pay ppc click marketing promotion strategy Injecting percocet Free web site promotion medical web site advertisi plastic surgeon auto dealers

8:27 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home